Recently I had the chance to apply my own templates to myself and my active project – as I had to mentor a new test manager. I was challenged in explaining how I read the upcoming IT environment project. After looking into resources for new test leads, I realized I could take my own medicine.

A year ago, I created a new test plan format – the Situational Aware Test Plan. While mind-maps and one-page test plan canvases exist, I wanted to elaborate using the evolution principles from Wardley mapping and stop writing test plan documents.
The table structure is there to provide guard rails for the elaboration. I will use the Darlings, Pets, Cattle, and GUID -mnemonic as headlines. Our strategic decisions emerge as we use the worksheet based on the current situation and state. The strategies will be the decisions to push a field in the grid to another state.
Delivery and Situation
Darlings | Pets | Cattle | GUID’s | |
---|---|---|---|---|
New project | Fixed date | |||
Existing delivery speed | Scheduled Quarterly | |||
Test Environments, internal | Repeatable | |||
Test environments with integrations | Crafted | Some existing know-how | ||
Environment Infrastructure | Hosted data center practices | |||
Test data | Known but cumbersome |
While this project introduces new test environments, there is an existing environment with a quarterly delivery pace. This is a classic example of the core chronic conflict of pursuing both: responding to the rapidly changing competitive landscape and providing stable, reliable, and secure services (DevOps handbook introduction xxv) as elaborated on Align your Test Strategy to your Business Strategy.
The test team allocated beside me and the new test lead is a new junior and senior tester. We are in the same team, and most are even in the same office. So collaboration will be collaborative and pervasive, with a focus on helping the new people grow.
The test team
Darlings | Pets | Cattle | GUID’s | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Test team collaboration | Growing | Pervasive | ||
Test lead | Growing | |||
Mentoring | Enabling | |||
Domain know-how | Getting there |
Test tools and approach
Darlings | Pets | Cattle | GUID’s | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Test activity | Explore integrations | Confirm internal requirements | ||
Test cases | Existing can be updated. | |||
Test case repro | Create new repository |
As mentioned in the blog post about visualization, we can now use the map to discuss why we need CT and ET for the project. Based on the project’s layout, I would advise having an expert exploration of the integrations and more standard scripts for the known construction of the internal environments.

[…] Taking My Own Medicine Written by: Jesper Ottosen […]
LikeLike
[…] Taking My Own Medicine, 2022, […]
LikeLike
[…] about the risks and the mitigations – less about testing everything to the dot. One tool to read the landscape is to communicate curiously about what the stakeholders value more – and value less. And on […]
LikeLike